this is a story about a special and
unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously
and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. the story can be interpreted as a
symbol of the independent spirit.
it seems to me that many readers’ english reading experience starts
with jane eyer. i am of no exception. as we refer to the movie “jane eyer”, it
is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and
retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an
independent person, both physically and mentally.
jane eyer was a born resister, whose
parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag.
since jane’s education
in lowwood orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common
person, just the same as any other girl around. the suffers from being
humiliated and devastated teach jane to be persevering and prize dignity over
anything else.as a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, jane got a
chance to be a tutor in thornfield garden. there she made the acquaintance of
lovely adele and that garden’s owner, rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face
outside. jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided
otherwise: after jane and rochester fell in love with each other and got down
to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact rochester had got a legal
wife, who seemed to be the shadow following rochester and led to his moodiness
all the time ----rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation.
jane did want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave,
because she didn’t want to
betray her own principles, because she was jane eyer. the film has finally got
a symbolist end: jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally
returned. after finding rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, jane chose to stay
with him forever.
i don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, i would rather regard
the section that jane began her teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i heard
jane’s words
“never in my life have i been awaken so happily.” for one thing, this ideal and
brand-new beginning of life was what jane had been imagining for long as a
suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views
hoped her to get. but the professional judgment of producing films reminded me
to wait for a totally different result: there must be something wrong coming
with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to
enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life that “life is like a box of
chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (by forrest gump’s mother, in the film “forrest
gump”)
what’s more, this film didn’t end when jane left thornfield. for jane eyer herself, there should
always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering
her fortitude, but for rochester, how he can get salvation? the film gives the
answer tentatively: jane eventually got back to rochester. in fact, when jane
met rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made his heel
strained, to a certain extent, which meant rochester would get retrieva l
because of jane. we can consider rochester’s experiences as that of religion meaning. the fire by his frantic
wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in his life. after it, rochester
got the mercy of the god and the love of the woman whom he loved. here we can
say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a
story accord with the requirements of both two sides. the value of this film
may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism
under the faith of religion.
第二篇：《简爱》英文读后感
this is a story about a special and
unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously
and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. the story can be interpreted as a
symbol of the independent spirit
it seems to me that many readers’
english reading experience starts with jane eyer. i am of no exception. as we
refer to the movie “jane eyer”, it is not surprising to
find some differences because of its being filmized and retold in a new way,
but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an independent person, both
physically and mentally.
jane eyer was a born resister, whose
parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag.
since jane’s education in lowwood orphanage began, she
didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply
being regarded as a common person, just the same as any other girl around. the
suffers from being humiliated and devastated teach jane to be persevering and
prize dignity over anything else.as a reward of revolting the ruthless
oppression, jane got a chance to be a tutor in thornfield garden. there she made
the acquaintance of lovely adele and that garden’s owner, rochester,
a man with warm heart despite a cold face outside. jane expected to change the
life from then on, but fate had decided otherwise: after jane and rochester
fell in love with each other and got down to get marry, she unfortunately came
to know in fact rochester had got a legal wife, who seemed to be the shadow
following rochester and led to his moodiness all the time ----rochester was
also a despairing person in need of salvation. jane did want to give him a
hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she didn’t want
to betray her own principles, because she was jane eyer. the film has finally
got a symbolist end: jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally returned.
after finding rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad
wife, jane chose to stay with him forever.
i don’t know what others feel,
but frankly speaking, i would rather regard the section that jane began her
teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i
heard jane’s words “never in my life have i been awaken so
happily.” for one thing, this ideal and brand-new beginning of life
was what jane had been imagining for long as a suffering person; for another,
this should be what the audiences with my views hoped her to get. but the
professional judgment of producing films reminded me to wait for a totally
different result: there must be something wrong coming with the
excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to enrich the
story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life
that “life is like a box of chocolates, you never know what you would
get.” (by forrest gump’s mother, in the film
“forrest gump”)
what’s more, this film
didn’t end when jane left thornfield. for jane eyer herself, there
should always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent
considering her fortitude, but for rochester, how he can get salvation? the
film gives the answer tentatively: jane eventually got back to rochester. in
fact, when jane met rochester for the first time, she scared his horse and made
his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant rochester would get
retrieva l because of jane. we can consider rochester’s experiences as
that of religion meaning. the fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for
the cynicism early in his life. after it, rochester got the mercy of the god
and the love of the woman whom he loved. here we can say: human nature and
divinity get united perfectly in order to let such a story accord with the
requirements of both two sides. the value of this film may be due to its
efforts to explore a new way for the development of humanism under the faith of
religion.
life is ceaselessly changing, but our
living principles remain. firmly persisting for the rights of being independent
gives us enough confidence and courage, which is like the
beacon over the capriccioso sea of life. in
the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves, which makes us
so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.
in this era of rapid social and
technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological
displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. we are
likely to find ourselves bogged down in the sargasso sea of information
overload and living unconsciousness. it’s our spirit that makes the
life meaningful.
heart is the engine of body, brain is the
resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. indubitably,
“jane eyer” is one of them.
第三篇：简爱的英文读后感
reading report
——jane eyre
jane eyre impressed me a lot. i was touched
not only by jane but also by the author.
the author, charlotte bronte, is a great woman.
although she had a miserable childhood, she managed to live a happy life, just
like jane eyre in the novel. jane was painful at her aunt’s home, for her aunt was
unsatisfied to support her in the case that her uncle was dead. then she was
sent to lowood when her aunt could not pretend to be kind any more. luckily,
she made friend with helen burns there and for the first time she felt she was
loved by someone. afterwards, with helen’s death, she grew up as an outstanding lady. at last, she was
determined to go out to see the big world and she got the job as governess in
thornfield hall. it seems that they were attracted by each other at the first
sight. though n rough footing at first, they fell in love. but the god didn’t bless this poor girl. unexpectedly,
rochestor had a mad wife before. jane was heartbroken and left him firmly. but
nothing could stop true love. she refused her cousin’s proposal and went back to the
thornfield
hall, only to find that this place was
burned and rochestor lost his one hand along with one eye. in the end, her
dream came true.
as is known to all, jane is an example of
women. she is so kind, beautiful and independent. she is kind of tenacious.
when she was living with her aunt, every time she was bullied or treated unjustly,
she would resist rather than resort. and her very character usually made her in
trouble. however, i’m for her reaction. because what if we take it for granted that we
should be abused? the biggest advantage of her may be her self-respect, or her
high moralities. when she heard that rochestor had a wife, it occurred to her
that she must leave him, though his wife was mad and he didn’t love her any more. in fact, she
didn’t need to
leave him in that case. no one would blame her. but she herself would feel
restless and blame herself. so she left in the midnight without hesitation. we
cannot imagine how much she wanted to have her own family. from this we can see
she was so moral that she did not allow herself to be the third person. it is
her high moralities that made him change. like himself said, ‘fresh and healthy, without soil or
taint. i’m
sure she will regenerate me with a
vengeance.’ we can infer
that the fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early in
his life. and jane’s goodness could pure his dark soul.
jane is pure, beautiful and persistent,
which i appreciate very much. and i hope to be that kind of people in the
future.
第四篇：《简爱》英文读后感
jane eyre in my eyes
(更多请搜索WWW.91exam.org)several years ago, when i was a little girl i have
already read the novel jane eyre. at that time, i was attracted by the touching
story. but today, after watching the movie, i was moved by jane, the adamant,
independent, brave and honest girl.why did we say jane was an adamant and
independent girl? let’s look at her childhood. her parents died when she was a little
girl, so she was brought up by her aunt mrs. reed, an acute and ruthless woman.
jane led a very bad life in her house. they treated her as badly as a ragtag.
but jane didn’t surrender.
later, she was sent to lowood school，an orphan school. in there she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common
person, just the same as any other girl around. mr. brocklehurste even asked
jane to stand on the chair and vilipended her in front of all the students. but
jane didn’t yielded.
and her only friend helen died, jane was very sad, but she was not depressive
all the time. instead, she studied and worked energetically. at last, she
became a teacher of logwood, and later became the family teacher of adele. from
her experience, we could found that jane was independent; she changed her fate
by herself. she suffered more than other girls at her age. she was independent
both in physically and mentally.
jane was brave. she dared to say no to mr.
brocklehurst, cut her beautiful hair with helen, and pull the horse for mr.
rochester. what’s more, she
dared to accepted mr. rochester’s love and pursuit of her own happy life. though she said:“ do you
think because i am poor, obscure, and little. i am soulless and heartless? you
think wrong!—i have as much soul as you—-and full as much heart! and if god had
gifted me with some beauty and much wealth, i should have made it was hard for
you to leave me, as it is not for me to leave you. i am not talking to you now
through the medium of custom, conventionalities, nor even of mortal flesh; it
is my spirit that addresses your spirit; just as it both had passed through the
grave, and we stood at god’s feet,. in her opinion, everyone is the same at the god’s feet. god hadn’t given her beauty and wealth, but
instead, god gave her a kind mind and a thinking brain. these words expressed
complete1y jane ’s rebellious
spirit．she told him
her own feeling, and emphasized that they were equal.
as we know, there was strict distinguish in
social stratum at that time. mr. rochester was in the high society, but jane
was only a family teacher. they were in quite different social stratums.what’s worse, in that society，people’s sense of love was on the
basis of money．for the sake of money they could
marry anyone even though the husband or the wife was an idiot on their eyes，
money was everything，money was marriage. but
unfortunately jane was very poor. that’s to say, jane should receive much rumor from society. in fact, she
didn’t afraid of
it. on the contrary, she accepted with no hesitation. when she knew rochester’s wife was dead and he was blind,
she went to look after rochester determinedly. she didn’t care about anything else. and i
still remember at the party, all the people from the high society laughed at
jane, they looked down upon jane. she kept silent though her heart was very
exciting. and to their surprise, miss ingrain was proved to be a loser, jane
defeated her though jane had no property and beauty．jane’ s plainness， poverty, position and disposition were contrasted to ingrain
obviously．jane drove
away those aristocrats from competitive stage．high position and great wealth showed by noble class was put aside．jane got glorious victory．
jane was self-respected and self-love. when
she knew rochester had a mad wife and she was still alive. jane left. she
couldn’t bare an
incomplete love. she left her lover rochester with contradiction and pain.
though she still loved him very much. she chose another road, which was
endless. she was kind and strict to the moral concept. she couldn’t accept herself do something
against the morality. she was self-respect.
to sum up, jane was a charming girl .what
she attracted us was not the beautiful face, lovely figure, and sweet voice
.but
her brave heart, intelligent brain and
adamant character. so we didn’t surprise that mr. rochester chose jane as his bride instead of
miss ingrain. because jane was much mature and richer in soul. as a girl, i
should learn from jane. especially in the materialistic society we should be in
charge of our own fate. don’t depend on others all the time. we should be independent .don’t lead a luxurious life and in hope
of marring a rich man, thinking that your husband would change your fate, your
social position. that’s silly. we should realize that only depend on your own struggle
then you could really charge your fate. what’s more, we need to be self-respect and self-love. as far as i am
concerned, as a girl if you don’t respect and love yourself, so how do you require others to respect
you? in short, we need to learn from jane eyre.
第五篇：简爱英文读后感
简爱英文读后感：
this is a story about a special and
unreserved woman who has been exposed to a hostile environment but continuously
and fearlessly struggling for her ideal life. the story can be interpreted as a
symbol of the independent spirit.
it seems to me that many readers’ english reading experience starts
with jane eyer. i am of no exception. as we refer to the movie “jane eyer”, it
is not surprising to find some differences because of its being filmized and
retold in a new way, but the spirit of the novel remains----to be an
independent person, both physically and mentally.
jane eyer was a born resister, whose
parents went off when she was very young, and her aunt，the only relative she had，treated her as badly as a ragtag.
since jane’s education
in lowwood orphanage began, she didn’t get what she had been expecting——simply being regarded as a common
person, just the same as any other girl around. the suffers from being
humiliated and devastated teach jane to be persevering and prize dignity over
anything else.as a reward of revolting the ruthless oppression, jane got a
chance to be a tutor in thornfield garden. there she made the acquaintance of
lovely adele and that garden’s owner, rochester, a man with warm heart despite a cold face
outside. jane expected to change the life from then on, but fate had decided
otherwise: after jane and rochester fell in love with each other and got down
to get marry, she unfortunately came to know in fact rochester had got a legal
wife, who seemed to be the shadow following
rochester and led to his moodiness all the
time ----rochester was also a despairing person in need of salvation. jane did
want to give him a hand, however, she made up her mind to leave, because she
didn’t want to
betray her own principles, because she was jane eyer. the film has finally got
a symbolist end: jane inherited a large number of legacies and finally
returned. after finding rochester’s misfortune brought by his original mad wife, jane chose to stay
with him forever.
i don’t know what others feel, but frankly speaking, i would rather regard
the section that jane began her teaching job in thornfield as the film’s end----especially when i heard
jane’s words
“never in my life have i been awaken so happily.” for one thing, this ideal and
brand-new beginning of life was what jane had been imagining for long as a
suffering person; for another, this should be what the audiences with my views
hoped her to get. but the professional judgment of producing films reminded me
to wait for a totally different result: there must be something wrong coming
with the excellence----perhaps not only should another section be added to
enrich the story, but also we may see from the next transition of jane’s life that “life is like a box of
chocolates, you never know what you would get.” (by forrest gump’s mother, in the film “forrest
gump”)
what’s more, this film didn’t end when jane left thornfield. for jane eyer herself, there should
always be somewhere to realize her great ideal of being independent considering
her fortitude, but for rochester, how he can get salvation?
the film gives the answer tentatively: jane
eventually got back to rochester. in fact, when jane
met rochester for the first time, she
scared his horse and made his heel strained, to a certain extent, which meant
rochester would get retrieva l because of jane. we can consider rochester’s experiences as that of religion
meaning. the fire by his frantic wife was the punishment for the cynicism early
in his life. after it, rochester got the mercy of the god and the love of the
woman whom he loved. here we can say: human nature and divinity get united perfectly
in order to let such a story accord with the requirements of both two sides.
the value of this film may be due to its efforts to explore a new way for the
development of humanism under the faith of religion.
life is ceaselessly changing, but our living
principles remain. firmly persisting for the rights of being independent gives
us enough confidence and courage, which is like the beacon over the capriccioso
sea of life. in the world of the film, we have found the stories of ourselves,
which makes us so concerned about the fate of the dramatis personae.
in this era of rapid social and
technological change leading to increasing life complexity and psychological
displacement, both physical and mental effects on us call for a balance. we are
likely to find ourselves bogged down in the sargasso sea of information
overload and living unconsciousness. it’s our spirit that makes the life meaningful.
heart is the engine of body, brain is the
resource of thought, and great films are the mirrors of life. in
抗击疫情
